Wednesday, April 28, 2009
National Abstinence Education Association
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
Dear Valerie Huber and the NAEA Board of Directors,
I am writing to you as a concerned individual regarding the teachings of age appropriate sexual education. After I have done weeks of research, I have come to a bold conclusion. Abstinence-only programs remain inefficient; therefore should be terminated by all United States sexual education teaching courses. I ask you and the NAEA to consider the following information.
My question to you and the NAEA team is, if teenage pregnancy prevention is a main objective to this association, why is this association still contributing to protect abstinence-only approaches while they remain ineffective? In this day and age, how can you support and serve a sexual education approach that is ineffective and contributing to the increase in teen pregnancy rates?
The reason that abstinence only programs remain ineffective is because a secular trend has developed over the past century. This secular trend correlates adolescent’s ages and the time they achieve menarche or spermarche. A normal adolescent girl in the 1920’s reached puberty around the age of 13. The secular tend has now shown that a current females can go through menarche at an age of 7. The most daunting fact of secular tend is that girls at the age of 7–10 are at risk to becoming pregnant.
In the year 2006, 750,000 girls in the U.S. between the ages of 15 and 19 that became pregnant, reported that their pregnancy was unplanned. This is an outstanding number of teenage girls and boys that may have ruined their lives from an irresponsible act that could have been prevented. I am not portraying that abstinence will never work, but rather I am implying that abstinence may only be effective until an age of experimenting in puberty. I believe that sexual education should be taught as separate age appropriate lessons. These hybrid lessons of abstinence and safe sex teachings have been inherited by communities and have noticed a significant drop in teen pregnancy rates. I am asking you and the NAEA to support and embrace the following ideas.
These classes consist of introducing a child to sex. First, abstinence is introduced at a level of strictly outlawing sex as a child. Abstinence is taught until a young teen age. Secondly, around the age of 11, teens will be introduced to a safe sex course that teaches when, why, and how, they should have intercourse. The main point that I am trying to make is abstinence will not overpower the urge to explore sexuality during puberty. Every teenager should have an adequate education when it comes to sexual education. Having this knowledge allows them to make responsible sexual decisions that may save lives. Now my question to you and the board of NAEA is, can you support these ideas and help fight against teen pregnancy with correct age appropriate sexual education?
Sincerely,
Josh Haveraneck
19231 Coachwood
Riverview Mi, 48193